Single-Stock ETF Risks: What Investors Need to Know

When exchange-traded funds (ETFs) first gained traction in Canada more than a decade ago, their main appeal was simple: low-cost, instant diversification. For roughly the cost of a single stock trade, investors could gain exposure to hundreds or even thousands of individual equities and bonds.

Today, however, a new generation of ETFs takes a very different approach. Single-stock ETFs, like Canadian Depositary Receipts (CDRs), track the performance of one company rather than a broad basket of securities. Many of these funds layer in options strategies, leverage, or both to boost income or deliver enhanced returns. They are not typical buy-and-hold vehicles and carry risks that can surface especially in turbulent market conditions.

Before investing, Canadians should understand the structure and objectives of these products. They can appear as familiar tickers in a convenient wrapper, but the mechanics behind them can produce outcomes that differ markedly from simply owning the underlying stock. Below is a concise guide to what investors should know about single-stock ETFs in Canada.

The two types of single-stock ETFs

Canadian single-stock ETFs generally fall into two categories: income-focused funds and trading-focused leveraged products.

Income-focused ETFs, offered primarily by Harvest ETFs and Purpose Investments, target investors seeking steady distributions. These funds commonly employ a mix of modest leverage (around 25% of portfolio value) and covered call strategies on roughly half of the holdings. For example, with $100 worth of stock, the fund might borrow $25 to increase the base of assets that generate dividends and option premium.

Covered calls work by selling another party the right to buy the ETF’s shares of a stock at a set price before an expiration date. The premium received becomes income for the fund and is typically distributed monthly. If the underlying stock rallies above the call strike, the fund caps its upside on the portion covered, while any uncovered shares remain exposed to further gains.

Purpose’s YieldShares and Harvest’s High Income Equity Shares cover well-known U.S. names such as Palantir, AMD, Coinbase, Broadcom, UnitedHealth, Costco, Netflix, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, Microsoft, Berkshire Hathaway, Tesla, Amazon, Apple, Alphabet and others. While the underlying tickers may overlap, each provider varies in precise holdings, strike selections, and implementation.

On the trading side, Longpoint ETFs offers SavvyLong and SavvyShort funds that aim for daily two-times (2x) exposure to individual U.S. stocks—either bullish or bearish. These are tactical tools rather than income vehicles and do not use covered calls or pay monthly distributions.

Longpoint’s funds have exemptive relief to borrow cash up to 100% of net asset value or to sell short. They can also use derivatives—futures, forward contracts or total return swaps—to meet their daily leverage targets. Forwards and swaps are typically arranged with bank counterparties and are collateralized to mitigate counterparty risk.

Benefits and risks of single-stock ETFs

Issuers market single-stock ETFs by highlighting two main advantages: convenience and access to advanced strategies without the need for hands-on management. For income investors, covered-call single-stock ETFs offer a turnkey way to collect monthly option premiums and dividends without managing strike selections, expirations, currency conversions, or complex brokerage workflows. These funds can often be held within registered accounts, which simplifies tax and custody considerations.

For active traders, leveraged single-stock ETFs provide a straightforward method to express a magnified short-term view without directly trading on margin, buying options, or opening short positions. These funds avoid option “Greeks” and offer daily amplified exposure to a stock’s direction.

However, these advantages come with important trade-offs. Income-oriented ETFs can underperform the underlying stock, particularly after accounting for borrowing costs, trading expenses, and management fees, and because covered calls cap upside on the portion of the position that’s sold. Monthly distributions in a non-registered account are taxable, which can reduce after-tax returns compared with holding the underlying shares.

Performance comparison

	Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	Berkshire Hathaway CDR (CAD hedged)	Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Start balance	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000
End balance	$15,710	$15,138	$15,726
Annualized return (CAGR)	19.80%	18.04%	19.85%
Standard deviation	16.91%	16.49%	16.21%
Best year	30.45%	25.28%	27.09%
Worst year	6.04%	5.73%	7.17%
Maximum drawdown	-11.13%	-9.38%	-8.90%
Sharpe ratio	0.87	0.79	0.90
Sortino ratio	1.64	1.44	1.68

_{Source: Portfolio Visualizer}

Leveraged daily-reset ETFs like Longpoint’s SavvyLong and SavvyShort are path-dependent: they target a fixed multiple of daily returns, not cumulative performance over weeks or months. Because of daily compounding, a 2x daily product will not necessarily deliver two times the monthly or annual return of the underlying stock. Over volatile or choppy markets, such funds can lose value even when the underlying stock finishes flat or modestly higher.

Longpoint’s prospectus stresses the acute short-term risks: within a single day a SavvyLong ETF could be wiped out if the stock drops 50% or more, and a SavvyShort ETF could be extinguished if the stock rises 50% or more. These products demand active monitoring and a clear tactical plan.

Costs also tend to be higher than for plain-vanilla ETFs. Management fees, borrowing charges, trading and derivative costs all increase the total management expense ratio (MER). For example, one YieldShares ETF lists a base management fee of 0.40% but a total MER of 1.75% after including additional fund expenses. Longpoint’s leveraged funds disclose higher management fees and will report full MERs after completing a fiscal year.

No need to blame issuers

ETF providers are responding to investor demand and to regulatory approvals that allow these products. Single-stock ETFs have grown rapidly in the U.S., and Canadian firms are bringing similar offerings to the market. The more pertinent question is why some investors prefer these concentrated, complex tools over diversified, low-cost portfolios.

There will always be investors attracted to higher-risk, higher-reward strategies or to steady monthly payouts. If these ETFs did not exist, many of those investors would likely pursue margin trading, options strategies, or futures contracts directly. In that sense, single-stock ETFs simply outsource sophisticated or aggressive strategies to professional managers.

Harvest and Purpose target yield-focused clients who prioritize regular income, while Longpoint appeals to traders who want concentrated, leveraged exposure to specific names rather than broad indices. These products are clearly aimed at experienced investors who understand the mechanics and the risks.

Longpoint’s prospectus is explicit: the double single-stock ETFs “are not suitable for investors who do not intend to actively monitor and manage their investments.” The bottom line for Canadian investors is straightforward: these ETFs are complex and expensive tools—use them only if you understand the strategy, costs, and potential for rapid losses.

Read more about investing with ETFs:

• The MoneySense ETF Screener
• Is VGRO a good investment? What else should I buy?
• TFSA confusion: The myths that just won’t die
• Best online brokers in Canada for 2025