The contest to acquire MEG Energy Corp. has sharpened into a direct choice between a friendly, cash-heavy proposal from one of Canada’s largest oilsands producers and a revised hostile bid from Strathcona Resources Ltd. The renewed Strathcona approach is now purely stock-based, reshaping the strategic and financial trade-offs MEG shareholders must weigh.
Strathcona’s amended bid, announced Monday, offers 0.80 of a Strathcona share for each MEG share it does not already own. The company’s earlier proposal included both cash and stock; the revised all-share offer is valued at $30.86 per MEG share, up from its previous valuation of $28.02 per share.
By contrast, the rival proposal from Cenovus Energy gives MEG shareholders a choice: receive $27.25 in cash or accept 1.325 Cenovus common shares for each MEG share, subject to certain limits embedded in the offer. That structure presents a clear short-term cash exit for some shareholders and a longer-term equity stake in a larger combined company for others.
Strathcona says Cenovus deal hands upside to acquirer rather than shareholders
Strathcona has criticized the Cenovus offer as “lopsided” and has questioned the integrity of MEG’s sale process, arguing that the board’s handling of the transaction has shortchanged shareholders. Adam Waterous, Strathcona’s executive chairman, sharply criticized the MEG board in an interview, saying the directors have left substantial value on the table for the company’s owners.
Waterous pointed out that Cenovus’ stock rose roughly 10% in the days after its agreement with MEG was announced — a move he says is unusual because acquirers’ share prices often decline on deal announcements. He characterizes that market reaction as a roughly $3.9-billion gain in Cenovus’ market value that most MEG shareholders would not fully capture under the Cenovus transaction, since MEG shareholders would hold only about 4% of the combined company after closing.
Rankings
Compare current TFSA rates in Canada
Independent comparison of top TFSA rates to help you decide where to save.
New bid frames the choice between immediate cash and long-term upside
Under Strathcona’s revised offer, MEG shareholders would own about 43% of the combined company, a substantially larger stake than under the Cenovus alternative. Waterous framed the two offers as fundamentally different paths: one offers a cash exit that leaves potential upside to the acquirer, while the other keeps shareholders invested in the future performance of the merged entity.
“These are two radically different paths,” Waterous said. “One is a cash exit, leaving Cenovus a $3.9-billion gain. The second keeps you on the train so you can try to capture that upside over time.” The Strathcona offer is set to expire on Oct. 20 unless extended or superseded by another proposal.
MEG’s board has publicly expressed concerns about the behavior of Strathcona’s largest shareholder, the Waterous Energy Fund, which is run by Adam Waterous. Board members worry such a stakeholder might sell its holdings after a takeover. Waterous has countered those concerns, stating his fund intends to remain invested for the long term and offering to enter into a lockup agreement not to sell shares if MEG supports the bid.
Waterous criticizes MEG board and warns the deal could be a governance case study
The Cenovus deal requires approval from MEG shareholders, with a two-thirds majority vote expected at a meeting set for Oct. 9. Strathcona has indicated it will vote its roughly 14.2% stake in MEG against the Cenovus transaction.
Waterous argued that the board’s handling of the transaction has been poor and said he has encountered no MEG shareholders satisfied with the current Cenovus agreement. He warned the situation could be used in business schools as an example of a board’s failure to fulfill its fiduciary duties.
Geographically and operationally, the parties have overlapping oilsands exposure. Cenovus and MEG both operate in the Christina Lake area south of Fort McMurray, Alberta. Strathcona also has operations in the region and contends a combination with its assets would generate similar synergies to those claimed by Cenovus.
Market reactions on the Toronto Stock Exchange showed modest moves after the competing offers: MEG shares rose about two per cent, or 58 cents, to $28.93 in early afternoon trading. Cenovus common shares edged down slightly to $22.02, while Strathcona’s stock declined modestly to $37.80.
Read more news
- Helping your kids buy a home? Why a cash gift may be safer than co-signing
- “Generation screwed”? Signs of strain in the youth job market
- When markets soar: how to avoid FOMO and keep a disciplined investing approach
- Which ETFs are the most tax-efficient for Canadian investors